Is your device Adobe-ready?
Feedback Forms prepared for our community consultations are designed to be interactive, so you have the choice over how you complete the form, and whether you choose to keep an electronic or printed copy of the comments you provide to us.
We are aware that not all of Apple's devices are set to allow users to fill and sign Adobe PDF documents, but this will not prevent you from providing feedback.
Apple has made available a downloadable app to enable anyone using one of their devices the ability to fill, sign and send electronically documents. For more information click here
If you prefer, you can also provide feedback without completing the feedback form provided - simply navigate to our Contact us
page and complete the form.
Ambitious and visionary, or delayed by an unwillingness to engage?
Do as we say, but don't be surprised if we don't do it... This month, in our Northern Insight
we ask why not engaging is not an option for planning applicants...
Stakeholder Engagement - so much more than a box-ticking exercise...
This month, in our Northern Insight column
we explore why stakeholder engagement
- done properly - is much more than just a box-ticking exercise...
New Year ; New Beginnings. Or will it be the smaller changes that will bring the biggest results?
This year sees Results Communications partner with Northern Insight magazine,
providing a regular monthly column
. In our first share, we ask what does 2017 have in store?
Redmarshall development allowed following appeal
Results Communications' client Prism Planning is celebrating after securing permission for a village development proposal following an appeal.
Darlington-based Prism Planning lodged the appeal for the proposed development within the grounds of a nursing home after Stockton Council failed to determine the application within the required timescale.
The outline planning application, for a development of four four-to-five-bedroom family homes, within the grounds of The Mains Nursing Home in Redmarshall, was the subject of considerable discussion and negotiation between Prism Planning and Stockton Council, as well as with the local community and statutory stakeholders.
The final proposal took on board concerns about the number of proposed houses and their proximity to water mains, and landscaping, and was revised to meet the requests and advice from Stockton Council.
Despite this, planning officers advised that the application would be heading towards refusal. In an effort to save time for their client, Prism Planning submitted its appeal.
Rod Hepplewhite, Director of Prism Planning, said: “We set out to work with planning officers from the outset, and worked closely with them to revise plans in accordance with officer advice and requests, so it was galling to see the application heading towards a refusal.
“Incredibly, the reason for the recommendation to refuse was based on the site being in an unsustainable location, with limited services and provisions, and requiring occupants to travel to employment, education, retail and recreational uses. Our argument was to the contrary; and that Redmarshall and nearby Carlton should be considered as one settlement when determining planning applications.”
Planning Inspector Paul Singleton visited the site last month, and in his narrative report identified the main issue as being “whether the proposal would constitute sustainable development having regard to the accessibility which future occupiers of the proposed dwellings would have to employment opportunities and essential services”.
Allowing the appeal, Mr Singleton explored the proximity of Redmarshall to Carlton – just 400 metres – and found that the available services within both villages was acceptable, and that the council’s assessment of the sustainability of the village was too narrow and did not have proper regard to the guidance within the National Planning Policy Framework which states that where there are groups of smaller settlements, development in one village may support services in a village nearby.Mr Hepplewhite added: “During our pre-application discussions it had become clear that the council had a closed mind to our arguments; submitting the appeal was the only sensible option.
“We were delighted that the Planning Inspector accepted the strength of our case to the extent that he agreed with us on every relevant planning issue. Of particular note was that he agreed with us that Redmarshall and Carlton should be considered as a single entity for planning purposes.”
Work will now commence to develop the details of the proposal, all of which were reserved with the exception of access arrangements.
ENDS | 070316